- #Symantec enterprise vault file system archiving archive
- #Symantec enterprise vault file system archiving code
Over the past five-or-so years it has done a good job of holding the competition at bay with frequent updates, new releases, additional acquisitions and functionality, integration services, partnerships, and, of course, superior account control and marketing.ĭriven by market forces and stiff competition, Symantec EV has morphed over the past 10 years from an email archive system into a comprehensive solution which incorporates scores of the critical features and functions necessary to support a multi-faceted, multi-departmental corporation. To its credit, Symantec recognized the market opportunity and the lack of availability of robust enterprise email archiving solutions. It was taken to the next level by a group of investors who greatly enhanced and productized the system as an in-house email archive solution, which became KVS in 1999.
#Symantec enterprise vault file system archiving code
The original code was created in 1997 by a messaging engineering team at Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC). However, the clear market share leader with roughly 30% of the high-end market is Symantec with Enterprise Vault, along with the array of products, interfaces and partnerships it has built into its enterprise archiving solution.Īs is the case with many of the enterprise data archiving solutions offered by the major players in the space, Enterprise Vault (EV) became part of Symantec by acquisition, in this case, through the Veritas deal in 2004. This high end of the in-house active archive market is stacked with major technology players including Autonomy, Computer Associates, EMC, HP, IBM, Microsoft and its many partners, OpenText, Oracle, and Symantec, along with niche or up-and-coming companies such as AXS-One, C2C, Commvault, Messaging Architects, Mimosa, Quest Software, Waterford Technologies, and ZL Technologies. They also wield more clout with vendors and can afford to hire the best consultants to help navigate through a very complex and costly implementation. Typically larger firms have the expertise to deal with the myriad business and technology integration challenges involved. Roughly 70% of companies with more than 4,000 mailboxes have chosen to implement in-house systems, while the percentage is even higher for enterprises with more than 10,000 employees. 46% give or take a few percentage points, However, an informal Wikibon survey indicates that in-house archiving solutions dominate the high end of the market. Generally accepted industry market share numbers for archive solutions adoption indicate a slight percentage edge for hosted and hybrid solutions over in-house solutions - perhaps 54% vs. This has been matched by a raft of new data reduction technologies coming to compress, deduplicate, and otherwise reduce the size of data archives, whether it be of the active, passive, or deep variety, in-house, hosted, or architecturally hybrid in nature. With the advent of new regulations including GLBA and SEC 17a-4 and updates to the FRCP mandating the need to electronically store and “quickly” produce business records, the last decade has seen a tremendous spike in the need for data archiving and related solutions such as classification, ediscovery and policy management.
They must rely on the “discoverability” capabilities of their information management solutions portfolio to improve access time to critical data for knowledge management, legal, regulatory compliance, or security purposes.
The need to store and manage business records such as documents, emails, images, video, Web content and other forms of electronically stored information (ESI) is fast becoming the top priority in many enterprises. It is no secret that enterprise information managers are buried by data, and the prospects for relief in the future are not good – especially when it comes to the unfettered growth of unstructured data.
0 kommentar(er)
